If a Jammed Assault Rifle saved Lives, wouldn’t no Assault Rifle?
July 22nd, 2012
Police are concluding that the semi-automatic rifle with 100-round drum attached used by the Aurora shooter jammed. He was then forced to use his Glock pistol and shotgun (a lot of the 60-some people wounded in the theater were hit by shot from the shotgun).
If this report is true, it seems sure that the malfunctioning of the assault weapon saved lives. Ordinarily it can fire 60 rounds in a minute.
Logically speaking, if a jammed assault weapon can be concluded to have saved lives, so that 12 died instead of 100, then wouldn’t it follow that making assault weapons unavailable would save lives?
Do not attempt logic with this subject the crazies in the US do not want any discussion about guns
This is the USA.. they don’t think logically about guns here. We still hide behind the second amendment.. which was written during a time of swords, muskets, cannons, and flintlock pistols. If they could have know the power of modern day weapons, I somehow doubt that would ever have made it into the document.