Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Afghanistan’

Burning of the Qur’ans

February 29th, 2012 Comments off
My latest blog post on the burning of the Qur’ans in Afghanistan.

Go to Source

Categories: Arab Blogs Tags: Afghanistan, burning, post, Qur, Source

Iraq is bigger a fiasco than Afghanistan!

February 22nd, 2012 Comments off

Afghanistan Exit Strategy: “Fight, Talk, Build” Working (for Fight, Anyway)

November 1st, 2011 Comments off

The Press Under Fire in Afghanistan

June 17th, 2011 Comments off

Is that rebel reading the Quran? Quick, that’s a scoop: "Libya is the new Afghanistan!"

April 6th, 2011 Comments off
Categories: Arab Blogs Tags: Afghanistan, Libya, Quran, scoop, Source

Map: Ethnicities Afghanistan

December 6th, 2010 Comments off
Map of Ethnicities Afghanistan

Ethnicities in Afghanistan

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Buzz This  Vote on DZone  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Kick It on DotNetKicks.com  Shout it  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Print
Go to Source

Kabul Safer For Children Than London?!

November 22nd, 2010 Comments off

Mark Sedwill, the Nato’s Senior Civilian Representative in Afghanistan made some rather peculiar comments, claiming that it is safer for children to grow up in Kabul than in Western cities such as London or New York. Does he seriously mean that?! Obviously he’s one of those individuals who are in Afghanistan to help re-development, but never leave their compound, because they are too afraid…

In Afghanistan, Obama Must Choose Between the Evil of Two Lessers

October 9th, 2010 Comments off
Categories: Arab Blogs Tags: Afghanistan, Evil, Lessers, Obama, Source

Terrorists use burqas to hide identity

July 29th, 2010 Comments off

U.S. general says male insurgents dressed in burqas hide among villagers in Afghanistan to avoid being caught.
Go to Source

"End game"

May 25th, 2010 Comments off
barack_obama_attends_a_briefing_on_afghanistan_in_the_situation_room_of_the_white_house

FB Ali via SST/ here

The players involved in the conflict in Afghanistan have all concluded that neither side can achieve a military victory and that it will end in some other way, probably through a negotiated solution. Since each of them has different goals, this end game is likely to be both confusing and complicated……

The mainstream viewpoint in the US administration, espoused by Secretary Gates and the military hierarchy, accepts the inevitability of a negotiated settlement but wants one that preserves a friendly government in Kabul that continues to lean on the US for support. If Taliban participation is unavoidable, it must be as limited as possible. They believe the insurgency has not yet been weakened enough to accept this kind of a settlement, and thus further military action is necessary. Hence the forthcoming Kandahar operation, as well as renewed pressure on Pakistan to complete the military takeover of its tribal areas. President Obama is going along with this policy for now but does not appear committed to it; he could abandon it if the approach does not work as successfully as its proponents promise.

Another school of thought in the administration (possibly including VP Biden) could be termed the minimalist position: it would agree to any kind of a negotiated settlement between the Afghan parties that would enable the US to get out of there expeditiously. They would like Hamid Karzai to pursue this option as soon as possible and get the best deal he can. There is also still a maximalist position in the US, advanced by those groups who believe the US should dominate the world with its military power, and who were the original backers of the Iraq and Afghan wars. This group advocates the continuation of the war until the Taliban are defeated and al-Qaeda is eradicated from the region. Its supporters in the administration maintain a low profile since this position is unlikely to ever become administration policy. (continue/ here)

Go to Source