Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Middle East’

Volume V of State of the Arts in the ME Viewpoints Series

July 13th, 2010 Arab News No comments

The fifth in MEI’s contninuing Viewpoints series on The State of the Arts in the Middle East is now online. Summary here; the full text (PDF) here.

The document itself contains links to the earlier volumes in the series.


Go to Source

'Green buildings' soon in UAE

July 7th, 2010 Arab News No comments

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has become the first region in the Middle East to begin work on environment-friendly government offices, dubbed 'green buildings'.
Go to Source

Gulf experts to discuss water crisis

July 7th, 2010 Arab News No comments

Experts from the Middle East will gather here next week to find out solutions to the water crisis in the Gulf region.
Go to Source

Turkey shaping up as key player in Middle East

June 25th, 2010 Arab News No comments

Turkey's new role as a major Middle East player is coming under increasing scrutiny.
Go to Source

New MEI Bulletin

June 12th, 2010 Arab News No comments

The June 2010 MEI Bulletin is now available, focusing on various aspects of nuclear development in the Middle East. The full issue is available here (PDF).


Go to Source

Israel rejects nuclear talks plan

May 29th, 2010 Arab News No comments

Israel denounces plans for a major conference on a nuclear-arms free Middle East, and says it will not take part.
Go to Source

Odd Disconnect Between Headline and Photo?

May 25th, 2010 Arab News 1 comment

As an editor, I only have to choose four photos a year these days: one for each cover of The Middle East Journal, but having worked in more frequent publications in the past, I’m aware of the danger of having a disconnect between your headline and your photo chosen to illustrate your story. This screen capture from this Ha’aretz story (I’m using a screen cap in case they change the photo or headline) exemplifies the problem:


And then they had a good laugh about it. I know that online reportage requires a lot of quick decisions, but given Ha’aretz’ overall political allegiances, I don’t think this was intentional.


Go to Source

“Saddam playing with boys would have no resonance in the Middle East — nobody cares,”

May 25th, 2010 Arab News No comments

In the Raw Story/ here

“… the CIA’s Iraq Operations Group considered creating a video that would the then-Iraqi leader having intercourse with a teenage boy. “It would look like it was taken by a hidden camera,” a former CIA official purportedly told Stein. “Very grainy, like it was a secret videotaping of a sex session.” The CIA would have then “flood[ed] Iraq with the videos,” the official added.

A third former CIA official said that the plan was shot down, in part, because others in the agency thought that claiming Saddam had sex with boys would do little to undermine him. “Saddam playing with boys would have no resonance in the Middle East — nobody cares,” another purported CIA official is quoted as saying. “Trying to mount such a campaign would show a total misunderstanding of the target. We always mistake our own taboos as universal when, in fact, they are just our taboos.”……

Stein notes, however, that the CIA did make a video in which a fake Osama Bin Laden enjoys a campfire and the company of his associates while bragging about their juvenile paramours…..”


Go to Source

The authorized secret activities could strain relationships with the likes of Saudi Arabia … & could anger the likes of Syria and Iran…"

May 25th, 2010 Arab News No comments

NYTimes/ here

“The top American commander in the Middle East has ordered a broad expansion of clandestine military activity in an effort to disrupt militant groups or counter threats in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and other countries in the region, according to defense officials and military documents. The secret directive, signed in September by Gen. David H. Petraeus, authorizes the sending of American Special Operations troops to both friendly and hostile nations in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa to gather intelligence and build ties with local forces. Officials said the order also permits reconnaissance that could pave the way for possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its nuclear ambitions escalate.

While the Bush administration had approved some clandestine military activities far from designated war zones, the new order is intended to make such efforts more systematic and long term, officials said. Its goals are to build networks that could “penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy” Al Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to “prepare the environment” for future attacks by American or local military forces, the document said. The order, however, does not appear to authorize offensive strikes in any specific countries.

In broadening its secret activities, the United States military has also sought in recent years to break its dependence on the Central Intelligence Agency and other spy agencies for information in countries without a significant American troop presence.

General Petraeus’s order is meant for small teams of American troops to fill intelligence gaps about terror organizations and other threats in the Middle East and beyond, especially emerging groups plotting attacks against the United States.

But some Pentagon officials worry that the expanded role carries risks. The authorized activities could strain relationships with friendly governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemenwhich might allow the operations but be loath to acknowledge their cooperation — or incite the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria. Many in the military are also concerned that as American troops assume roles far from traditional combat, they would be at risk of being treated as spies if captured and denied the Geneva Convention protections afforded military detainees……. A Pentagon order that year (2004) gave the military authority for offensive strikes in more than a dozen countries, and Special Operations troops carried them out in Syria, Pakistan and Somalia…..”

Go to Source

Petraeus Memo Widens scope of US Military Covert Operations in ME

May 25th, 2010 Arab News No comments

The 7-page memo seen by the NYT and signed by CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus authorizes US troops to engage in clandestine intelligence-gathering in the greater Middle East. The article implies that the memo also authorizes more military teams to go into unconventional conflict situations in both unfriendly and friendly countries.

Critics worry that the order blurs the line between combat soldiers and spies and weakens the claim of all soldiers to human treatment under the Geneva Conventions.

My own view is that the United States was founded as a government of laws, not men, and that the siren call of covert operations is steadily undermining the rule of law. Blurring the line between military action and spying makes it impossible to talk about the covert missions, since they are typically classiified. The same is true for predator drone strikes.

Military action such as launching drones should be carried out by the uniformed military, not by CIA operatives or, worse, contractors. The former action would allow us to discuss the campaigns as free citizens of a republic. As it is now, often civilian contractors are piloting drones long-distance and we cannot so much as get a straight answer out of the elected officials. Where the US is striking at friendly countries, there should be a Status of Forces agreement to provide a legal framework for the actions.

And intelligence gathering should be carried out by the civilian such agencies. The more you make elements of the military actually intelligence assents, the more likely it is that the lines between them will get strained. That blurring could be bad for all troops. There is already a tendency in the ME for locals to see all Americans as CIA, and giving troops a lot of covert missions will reinforce these views.

We still can be a country of laws, not men, can’t we? It isn’t too late?

Go to Source