Archive

Posts Tagged ‘national security council’

More Israeli propaganda failures

June 3rd, 2010 Arab News No comments

Max Blumenthal shows that the IDF is quietly redacting its own press releases to remove allegations of links between the IHH members of the flotilla and al-Qaeda:

Not content to believe that night vision goggles signal membership in Al Qaeda, Israel-based freelance reporter Lia Tarachansky and I called the IDF press office to ask for more conclusive evidence. Tarachansky reached the IDF’s Israel desk, interviewing a spokesperson in Hebrew; I spoke with the North America desk, using English. We both received the same reply from Army spokespeople: “We don’t have any evidence. The press release was based on information from the [Israeli] National Security Council.” (The Israeli National Security Council is Netanyahu’s kitchen cabinet of advisors).

Today, the Israeli Army’s press office changed the headline of its press release (see below), basically retracting its claim about the flotilla’s Al Qaeda links.

We debunked the basis of previous al-Qaeda links here.



Go to Source

Blog, "high-jacked", by an Obama henchman

March 29th, 2010 Arab News No comments

“Obama’s ‘Oval Office’ as per the Pro-Israel lunatics…”

Jeffrey Goldberg, coming to the rescue of Denis Ross … Very Funny … In the Atlantic/ here


Laura Rozen (story) allows an anonymous Administration official to hijack her blog and accuse the National Security Council’s Dennis Ross of dual-loyalty:


“He [Ross] seems to be far more sensitive to Netanyahu’s coalition politics than to U.S. interests,” one U.S. official told POLITICO Saturday. “And he doesn’t seem to understand that this has become bigger than Jerusalem but is rather about the credibility of this Administration.”
What some saw as the suggestion of dual loyalties shows how heated the debate has become….”

An alternative explanation might be that Ross, who is a well-known critic of Netanyahu’s, understands the internal dynamics of Netanyahu’s dysfunctional coalition, and is looking for smart ways for President Obama to manipulate the situation so that progress — not merely rhetorical progress, but actual progress — can be made, both in bringing about the territorial compromise needed for peace, and in stopping Iran from going nuclear. But in today’s neo-Lindberghian climate, if a Jewish Administration official suggests a course of action that can be interpreted in any way as sympathetic to Israel, he will be called a dual-loyalist, in this case by a coward hiding behind a screen of anonymity erected by Politco.”

Go to Source

US Official: "… we are prepared to listen…"

February 3rd, 2010 Arab News No comments

POLITICO/ here

“… The U.S. reacted cautiously … indicating it was willing to listen if Iran has genuinely changed its position on the fuel swap deal, while it was continuing preparations with key allies on sanctions for further pressuring Iran…..

If Iran has something new to say, we are prepared to listen,” a U.S. official said on condition of anonymity. “We made a good faith and balanced offer regarding the Tehran research reactor,” National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer said. “We believe it makes sense for all parties. If Mr. Ahmadinejad’s comments reflect an updated Iranian position, we look forward to Iran informing the IAEA.”……

Ahmadinejad also reportedly told Iranian State TV that Iran would consider exchanging U.S. citizens being detained in Iran for Iranians being held abroad. “We are having talks to have an exchange if it is possible,” Ahmadinejad was cited. “We are hopeful that all prisoners will be released.”


The NSC’s Hammer stressed that the reports of what Ahmadinejad said are fragmentary, and the U.S. has not entered into any discussion with Iran about an exchange. “With regards to what Ahmedinejad said, [I] want to stress that these reports are fragmentary. ……. “If President Ahmadinejad’s comments suggest that they are prepared to resolve these cases, we would welcome that step,” Hammer continued. “But we have not entered into any discussion with Iran about an exchange. As we have indicated publicly, if Iran has questions about its citizens in U.S. custody, we are prepared to answer them.”….”

Go to Source

Hugh Miles: Prince Bandar in prison

January 20th, 2010 Arab News No comments

Bandar: in the brig?A few months ago I saw an Iranian report that claimed that Prince Bandar — known as “Bandar Bush” for his closeness to the Bush family — was under arrest after having tried to plot a coup. I was skeptical, and emailed a Saudi specialist about it, who dismissed it instantly. Bandar hasn’t been seen much since he left the US after being replaced as ambassador, and is probably unhappy with King Abdullah’s policies and the rise of Prince Nayef as the most likely successor to the throne. This much is known. The idea of a coup sounded pretty far-fetched.

Yesterday Hugh Miles wrote in the LRB blog that Saudi dissidents claim Bandar and four generals may be held in prison:

According to Saudi opposition sources, Bandar is now in Dhaban Prison, in north west Jeddah, a high security jail where terrorist suspects and political opposition figures are held. Bandar is said to be in a special wing where the other prisoners are four senior generals: one from the army, one from the royal guard, one from the national guard and one from internal security. Bandar’s lawyer in the US denies he is in prison and says he has been seen out and about recently, although he wouldn’t divulge when, where or even in which country.

The last official sighting of Bandar in public seems to have been on 10 December 2008, when he met the king in Jeddah. Since then he has missed a string of important events, and no one will say why. In September 2009, when his position as head of the Kingdom’s National Security Council was renewed for another four years, he didn’t appear in public to profess his allegiance to the king, as is customary. No official explanation was forthcoming. The same month, Bandar missed the Dallas Cowboys’ first home game against the New York Giants in their new stadium. Bandar has been a Cowboys fan since he flew as a fighter pilot instructor in Texas in the 1970s. He normally sits next to his friend Jerry Jones, the team’s owner. Then in October Bandar failed to show up as one of the official delegation accompanying King Abdullah on his landmark visit to Damascus, which ended the four-year estrangement between Saudi Arabia and Syria that began with the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri in 2005.

But the most significant event Bandar missed was in December 2009 when his ill father, Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, returned to the Kingdom after months convalescing in Morocco. As usual, the event was shown live on TV and Prince Sultan received many members of the Saudi royal family. Some senior figures – such as Princes Talal, Muteb and Abdulrahman – weren’t there for known reasons. But Bandar’s absence hasn’t been accounted for.

The lack of any official explanation of Bandar’s whereabouts is especially puzzling since he is supposed to head an important government agency. When he returned from Washington in 2005 after his 22-year stint as ambassador, his appointment as secretary-general of the newly formed National Security Council was meant to signal a return to the family fold and a higher domestic profile. In the months before his disappearance he travelled frequently to Moscow, both to negotiate arms deals and to try to persuade the Kremlin to halt its military co-operation with Iran. There’s been speculation that his activity in Russia could be connected to his disappearance: some blogs claim that Bandar’s supposed abortive coup was exposed by Russian intelligence.

That would be quite huge. Miles speculates that whatever the truth of the matter, Bandar’s era of influence is over. This also means one of the major advocates of a strong relationship with the US is now absent, at a time when the next king of Saudi Arabia is likely to be Prince Nayef, who is less sanguine about Amreeka. And so, little by little, US dominion over the Middle East is being eroded.



Go to Source

Israel’s Uzi Arad on a "hush-hush" visit to India

January 6th, 2010 Arab News No comments

In the Times of India/ here


“India’s close cooperation with Israel in dealing with terror received further impetus on Monday when Israel’s NSA Uzi Arad visited India and held talks with his counterpart M K Narayanan. Arad was accompanied by a delegation comprising experts on counter-terror measures on the visit, which was kept under wraps for obvious reasons.
Some of the “key issues” discussed included Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, Iran and the threat to Israel nationals in India……

Arad, who is also the chairman of the Israeli National Security Council, spoke about the threat of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons falling into the hands of jehadi forces. In fact, Pakistan formed the core of the discussions as the two sides expressed concern about the terror groups operating out of the country. The situation emerging in the Afghanistan war was also discussed. Arad is said to have conveyed to
India that one of Israel’s main concerns now was to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
The two sides also discussed weapons to be acquired by India from Israel including the need for purchasing equipment essential to ensure security at airports…..”

Go to Source

Israeli dogs get more coverage than Palestinian human beings

December 16th, 2009 Arab News No comments

An IDF-trained dog by the name of Miky has put the Police Department of Helena, Montana on the map in recent days.” And this dog was featured in US newspapers too. I won’t be surprised if this dog gets an appointment in Obama’s National Security Council.

Go to Source

"Problems" with the US-Russian agreement to allow lethal military materials pass through Russian space on the way to Afghanistan?

November 12th, 2009 Arab News No comments

In the CABLE, here

“Richard Holbrooke, the Obama administration’s special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, is headed to Russia soon, just as the National Security Council is conducting “emergency measures” to deal with problems surrounding a new U.S.-Russian agreement to transit lethal materials through Russian space to supply U.S. troops in Afghanistan. …….there are increasing signs Holbrooke’s reach is widening. A team from Holbrooke’s office is currently in Beijing for discussions with Chinese officials on both Pakistan and Afghanistan…….

Meanwhile, multiple sources tell The Cable that there are problems with the U.S.-Russian agreement to allow lethal military materials pass through Russian space on the way to Afghanistan. The deal, agreed to in July during Obama’s trip there, is the one tangible example of progress in the administration’s effort to “reset’ U.S.-Russian relations…… But the Russians are now attempting to place new conditions on the supply routes, the sources said. For example, Russia is demanding to know exactly what items are in each shipment before allowing them to go through, a condition the U.S. military is not about to meet.

The U.S. government is receiving different messages from different segments of the Russian government …”

Go to Source

Seif Qadhafi’s Comeback

October 21st, 2009 Arab News No comments

qadhafi-mural.jpg

From Flickr user Miles_78.

Al Sharq al-Awsat brings some clarification about the recent nomination of Seif al-Islam Qadhafi to a post that would bring him, legally at least, much control over Libya’s institutions – Saif al-Islam to Decide on Nomination Soon:

“Saif-al-Islam withdrew suddenly from the political and public life in Libya last year in what appeared to be a setback for his plan to bring about radical changes in the Libyan state at the political and economic levels. Col. Al-Qadhafi proposed to the institutions in Libya in an official speech last week, which the official media did not report, to enable his son to occupy an official post so that he can continue and implement his reform program and the social leaderships immediately nominated his son as their chairman.

Seif’s appointment, should he accept it (I can’t imagine he won’t), contrasts with the public visibility of his brother Muatassim over the last year. Ever since it was leaked that Muatassim has been getting help from American lobbying firms in not only reaching the ears of prominent Western politicians and academics, but also in setting up the National Security Council that he allegedly runs. The leaks revealed Muatassim was hardly impressive, requiring much coaching, although his money and lobbyists did buy him a photo-op with Hillary Clinton. Should we read into this that Seif, who had earlier overreached, is back as designated successor after his eclipse over the past year? Was it his brother’s disgrace alone that did the trick, or did Seif have something to do with the liberation of Abdel Basset al-Meghrahi which so overjoyed his father? If any readers have a theory about this, do let us know.

Do read the rest of the article, which speculates that Seif’s return aux affaires may give a boost to the ongoing reconciliation with Libya’s Salafists.



Go to Source

Tehran Seeking Nuclear Technology

October 20th, 2009 Arab News No comments

In DECLASSIFIED, here

“…….Suspected Iranian purchasing agents have been using front companies registered on the politically divided Mediterranean island to buy precision Western technology that can be used in designing and building atom bombs, according to reports seen by European intelligence and law-enforcement agencies.

The front companies, some based in Northern Cyprus, a Turkish-run enclave notorious for lax financial regulation, have been ordering equipment and computer software whose capabilities are so unusual and sophisticated that atomic weapons development is among their few known applications. The “dual-use” technology, manufactured by tiny specialized engineering companies in countries such as Germany and Switzerland, does have some potential civilian applications, which is why intelligence officials say that evidence of Iranian efforts to purchase such items doesn’t constitute 100 percent proof that Tehran is currently trying to build a bomb….

US counterproliferation officials said that any proposed revisions in the 2007 US NIE on Iran’s nukes would be subjected to rigorous review and testing inside the intelligence community before any report is issued. If a revised or updated NIE is released it is quite possible that no unclassified version will ever be released. AWall Street Journal report about possible revisions in the 2007 NIE said that the National Security Council and Vice President Joe Biden’s office had expressed interest in an updated NIE, but that it could take “months” to produce. Counter-proliferation officials told NEWSWEEK that at a minimum such a report probably would not be ready for at least two months.”

Go to Source

Look at those references to Lebanon from 1970

September 20th, 2009 Arab News No comments

This will reinforce the conspiracy theories about the Lebanese civil war in 1975:
“Kissinger: “If we have a civil war in Lebanon resulting from Palestinian action, and Lebanon asks for intervention, what would be our view?”
Helms: “The imagination boggles. It was bad enough in 1958, but now, with the fedayeen as a complicating factor!”
Kissinger: “If we don’t do it, would we have the Israelis do it – or anyone do it? Let’s review the existing papers on Lebanon.”
Harold Saunders, of the National Security Council: “You recall we had an Israeli option.
Kissinger: “Would nothing be better than the Israelis? Let’s review these papers again.”"

Go to Source